The Court there confronted a claim, based on Washington v. Glucksberg, 521 U.S. 702 (1997), that the Fourteenth Amendment must be defined in a most circumscribed manner, with central reference to specific historical practicesexactly the view todays majority follows. They are therefore inapposite. We think not. Use this format for enacted bill or resolution not signed into law; Bills and resolutions passed by Congress & signed by the President to become law should be cited as statutes . It must be sustained if there is a rational basis on which the legislature could have thought that it would serve legitimate state interests. The measured course charted by the concurrence would be fraught with turmoil until the Court answered the question that the concurrence seeks to defer. But, in future cases, we should follow the text of the Constitution, which sets forth certain substantive rights that cannot be taken away, and adds, beyond that, a right to due process when life, liberty, or property is to be taken away. Carlton, 512 U.S., at 42 (opinion of Scalia, J.). 28 The majoritys sole citation for its concreteness requirement is Payne v. Tennessee, 501 U.S. 808 (1991). I respect those who advocate for that position, just as I respect those who argue that this Court should hold that the Constitution legalizes pre-viability abortion throughout the United States. The concurrence concedes that its approach would not be available if the rationale of Roe and Casey were inextricably entangled with and dependent upon the viability standard. Post, at 7. See United States v. Texas, 595 U.S. ___, ___ (2021) (Sotomayor, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (slip op., at 6). The text of the Constitution does not refer to or encompass abortion. Even an uncomplicated pregnancy imposes significant strain on the body, unavoidably involving significant physiological change and excruciating pain. And over the course of our history, this Court has taken up the Framers invitation. Would it be scrupulously neutral for the Court to eliminate those rights too? Many women, however, still do not have adequate healthcare coverage before and after pregnancy; and, even when insurance coverage is available, healthcare services may be far away.14 Women also continue to face pregnancy discrimination that interferes with their ability to earn a living. Nov 17, 2022 11:18 AM Senior Apartments For Rent In Urbana, Ohio, Mackert Consulting Group And ( 2 ) author-date to Cite < /a > Basic Statutory Format Resources: Legal Information page November 20, 2020 School Class of 2012, Bank! 36 See 410 U.S., at 154155 (collecting cases decided between 1970 and 1973); C. Means, The Phoenix of Abortional Freedom: Is a Penumbral or Ninth-Amendment Right About To Arise From the Nineteenth-Century Legislative Ashes of a Fourteenth-Century Common-Law Liberty? 84 La. Criminal Procedure, Federal Rules of
Code Ann. See id., at 877878. You may wish to go to a law library and consult a reference librarian to obtain background information on your issue. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. 79 1848 Va. Acts p. 96 (emphasis added). [A] lot of people thought, he explained, that finally, we have a conservative Court and so now would be a good time to start testing the limits of Roe.30 In its petition for certiorari, the State had exercised a smidgen of restraint. Basic Legal Citation About LII Get the law Lawyer directory Legal encyclopedia Help out Introduction to Basic Legal Citation Table of contents Index Help eBook WHAT AND WHY? That the common law did not condone even pre-quickening abortions is confirmed by what one might call a proto-felony-murder rule. Roe was egregiously wrong from the start. Roe held that the abortion right is part of a right to privacy that springs from the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments. There is no rule that parties can confine this Court to disposing of their case on a particular groundlet alone when review was sought and granted on a different one. And West Coast Hotel was issued against a backdrop of unprecedented economic despair that focused attention on the fundamental flaws of existing precedent. 6 See id., at 944 (Rehnquist, C.J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part); id., at 979 (Scalia, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part). See supra, at 4142. However, the three main citation Style Guides most commonly used when youre an undergraduate include the MLA Style, APA Style, and Chicago/Turabian Style. When a neutral citation becomes available, it is the official case citation issued by the court and should always be used to cite the case. 6, 21 (1828) (emphasis added); 1829 N.Y. Search About LII. On your issue introduced to the section `` state statute Citation '' and click on the Examples. Nor does it propound any other theory that could show that the Constitution supports its new rule. These women know, even as they choose to have an abortion, what it is to look at a sonogram image and to value a fetal life. It is used by most U.S. law schools and federal courts, and thus is prevalent among law students and professionals. The consent of the woman to the performance of the operation or administering of the medicines or substances, referred to, shall be no defense, and she shall be a competent witness in any prosecution under this act, and for that purpose she shall not be considered an accomplice.105, Sec. 100 1876 Ga. Acts & Resolutions p. 113 (emphasis added). Under that rule, [u]nnecessary health regulations that have the purpose or effect of presenting a substantial obstacle to a woman seeking an abortion impose an undue burden on the right. Casey, 505 U.S., at 878 (emphasis added). The Bluebook provides detailed rules for how to cite legal sources. It is noteworthy that the percentage of women who register to vote and cast ballots is consistently higher than the percentage of men who do so.66 In the last election in November 2020, women, who make up around 51.5 percent of the population of Mississippi,67 constituted 55.5 percent of the voters who cast ballots.68. Those responsible for the original Constitution, including the Fourteenth Amendment, did not perceive women as equals, and did not recognize womens rights. Stat. 85 1858 Iowa Acts p. 93 (codified in Iowa Rev. V; J. Sutton, 51 Imperfect Solutions: States and the Making of American Constitutional Law 721, 203216 (2018); A. Amar, Americas Constitution: A Biography 285291, 315347 (2005). But that predictive judgment has not borne out. Health Nursing 462 (2015) (pregnancy is discoverable and ordinarily discovered by six weeks of gestation). 810 Sharon Drive, Suite 100 APA citation style refers to the rules and conventions established by the American Psychological Association for documenting sources used in a research paper. 95 Neb. It held that the State could prohibit abortions after fetal viability, so long as the ban contained exceptions to safeguard a womans life or health. Brown thought that whether the ratification-era history supported desegregation was [a]t best . It shall be unlawful for any person to prescribe or administer to any pregnant woman, or to any woman whom he has reason to believe pregnant, at any time during the period of gestation, any drug, medicine or substance, whatsoever, with the intent thereby to procure the miscarriage of such woman, or with like intent, to use any instrument or means whatsoever, unless such miscarriage is necessary to preserve her life; and any person so offending, shall be punished by a fine of not less than five hundred nor more than one thousand dollars, and imprisoned in the State prison for not less than one nor more than ten years., Sec. 509. I agree thatwhether it was originally holding or dictumthe viability line is clearly part of our past precedent, and the Court has applied it as such in several cases since Roe. It helps define a sphere of freedom, in which a person has the capacity to make choices free of government control. The Virginia law in force in 1863 stated: Sec. It contributes to the actual and perceived integrity of the judicial process. Ibid. On the other side of 1868, the majority occasionally notes that many States barred abortion up to the time of Roe. The weaknesses in Roes reasoning are well-known. Roe and Casey arrogated that authority. The viability line has nothing to do with advancing such permissible goals. Accordingly, those cases do not support the right to obtain an abortion, and the Courts conclusion that the Constitution does not confer such a right does not undermine them in any way. (slip op., at 1). See ante, at 32, 66, 7172; ante, at 10 (Kavanaugh, J., concurring); but see ante, at 3 (Thomas, J., concurring). Roe fanned into life an issue that has inflamed our national politics in general, and has obscured with its smoke the selection of Justices to this Court in particular, ever since. Casey, 505 U.S., at 995996 (opinion of Scalia, J.). The majority (or to be more accurate, most of it) is eager to tell us today that nothing it does cast[s] doubt on precedents that do not concern abortion. Ante, at 66; cf. The Court therefore struck a balance, turning on the stage of the pregnancy at which the abortion would occur. Another amicus brief relied upon by respondents (see Brief for Respondents 21) tries to dismiss the significance of the state criminal statutes that were in effect when the Fourteenth Amendment was adopted by suggesting that they were enacted for illegitimate reasons. That right is unique, the majority asserts, because [abortion] terminates life or potential life. Ante, at 66 (internal quotation marks omitted); see ante, at 32, 7172. Argued December 1, 2021Decided June 24, 2022, DOBBS v. JACKSON WOMENS HEALTH ORGANIZATION. If the act you are referring to has more than one section, add two section symbols before first section number. 2 Ways for options in the annotated code work in the left of! 1972) (imposing penalty for any abortion and treating a woman who aborted a quick child as if she were a murderess). 103, 111123 (1985); A. Cameron, The Exposure of Children and Greek Ethics, 46 Classical Rev. Chicago-Style Quick Guide. As Casey recognized, the two cases are relevant only to showby stark contrasthow unjustified overturning the right to choose is. For half a century, Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), have protected the liberty and equality of women. For reasons already explained, Roes constitutional analysis was far outside the bounds of any reasonable interpretation of the various constitutional provisions to which it vaguely pointed. This Court mostly does not even grant certiorari on one-year-old, one-to-one Circuit splits, because we know that a bit of disagreement is an inevitable part of our legal system. At any time after that point, the State could regulate to protect the pregnant womans health, such as by insisting that abortion providers and facilities meet safety requirements. I am not sure, for example, that a ban on terminating a pregnancy from the moment of conception must be treated the same under the Constitution as a ban after fifteen weeks. post-conviction relief. Most recently, the Courts of Appeals have disagreed about whether the balancing test from Whole Womans Health correctly states the undue-burden framework.53 They have disagreed on the legality of parental notification rules.54 They have disagreed about bans on certain dilation and evacuation procedures.55 They have disagreed about when an increase in the time needed to reach a clinic constitutes an undue burden.56 And they have disagreed on whether a State may regulate abortions performed because of the fetuss race, sex, or disability.57, The Courts of Appeals have experienced particular difficulty in applying the large-fraction-of-relevant-cases test. Then, after surveying history, the opinion spent many paragraphs conducting the sort of fact-finding that might be undertaken by a legislative committee, and did not explain why the sources on which it relied shed light on the meaning of the Constitution. ).Most often, you will need to cite to either of these unofficial codes because Congress enacts new laws and Link through to their profiles for deeper information. Stat., Tit. The Solicitor General next suggests that history supports an abortion right because the common laws failure to criminalize abortion before quickening means that at the Founding and for decades thereafter, women generally could terminate a pregnancy, at least in its early stages.40 Brief for United States 2627; see also Brief for Respondents 21. Precedents should be respected, but sometimes the Court errs, and occasionally the Court issues an important decision that is egregiously wrong. If that happens, the views of [an individual States] citizens will not matter. Through that democratic process, the people and their representatives may decide to allow or limit abortion. In addition, Doe v. Bolton, 410 U.S. 179 (1973), has been interpreted by some to protect a broad right to obtain an abortion at any stage of pregnancy provided that a physician is willing to certify that it is needed due to a womans emotional needs or familial concerns. 1. And as for Casey, arguments for or against the viability rule played only a de minimis role in the parties briefing and in the oral argument. Id., at 163. It also resembles general standards that courts work with daily in other legal sphereslike the rule of reason in antitrust law or the arbitrary and capricious standard for agency decisionmaking. The Constitution, of course, does not mention that word. [Last updated in July of 2022 by the Wex Definitions Team] wex ACADEMIC TOPICS legal education and writing THE LEGAL PROCESS courts criminal procedure civil procedure . (slip op., at 1518); id., at ______ (opinion of Kavanaugh, J.) More will follow. Applying general standards to particular cases is, in many contexts, just what it means to do law. 1718, 51 (fleeting discussion of the viability rule). either express or implied. 4 Blackstone 198 (emphasis deleted). This may be followed by a series designation. In West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937), the Court overruled Adkins v. Childrens Hospital of D. C., 261 U.S. 525 (1923), which had held that a law setting minimum wages for women violated the liberty protected by the Fifth Amendments Due Process Clause. We have already discussed Roes treatment of constitutional text, and the opinion failed to show that history, precedent, or any other cited source supported its scheme. in the Ninth Amendments reservation of rights to the people. Id., at 153. The experience of the Courts of Appeals provides further evidence that Caseys line between permissible and unconstitutional restrictions has proved to be impossible to draw with precision. Janus, 585 U.S., at ___. And the doctrine of stare decisisa critical element of the rule of lawstands foursquare behind their continued existence. For this reason, the Court has been reluctant to recognize rights that are not mentioned in the Constitution. Code Ann. See Webster, 492 U.S., at 518521 (plurality opinion) (abandoning key elements of the Roe framework under stare decisis while declining to reconsider Roes holding that the Constitution protects the right to an abortion). Repository: Division of Rare and Manuscript Collections. 296297. Caseys undue burden test has proved to be unworkable. 31 We have since come to understand Gideon as part of a larger doctrinal shiftalready underway at the time of Gideonwhere the Court began to hold that the Due Process Clause fully incorporates particular rights contained in the first eight Amendments. McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742, 763 (2010); see also id., at 766. Even before we get to stare decisis, we dissent. This certificate program is designed to help current and aspiring human resource managers and staff understand employment laws and regulations in order to deal effectively with labor-related legal issues in the workplace. Last summer, we announced our plans to take over the operation of the Women & Justice caselaw collection, which has been created by Cornell Laws Avon Center prior to its closure. 257, 265, 267 (1985) (noting that these manuals were the justices primary source of legal reference and of practical value for a wider audience than the justices).For cases stating the proto-felony-murder rule, see, e.g., Commonwealth v. Parker, 50 Mass. as Amici Curiae 1320, 2941, with Brief for Respondents 3641; Brief for National Womens Law Center et al. As even the Casey plurality recognized, [a]bortion is a unique act because it terminates life or potential life. 505 U.S., at 852; see also Roe, 410 U.S., at 159 (abortion is inherently different from marital intimacy, marriage, or procreation). Caseys controlling opinion skipped over that question and reaffirmed Roe solely on the basis of stare decisis. Others have suggested that support can be found in the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause, but that theory is squarely foreclosed by the Courts precedents, which establish that a States regulation of abortion is not a sex-based classification and is thus not subject to the heightened scrutiny that applies to such classifications. Under our precedents, the quality of the reasoning in a prior case has an important bearing on whether it should be reconsidered. The Constitution does not freeze for all time the original view of what those rights guarantee, or how they apply. 5662. And as Blackstone said before him: It keep[s] the scale of justice even and steady, and not liable to waver with every new judges opinion. 1 Blackstone 69. These legitimate interests include respect for and preservation of prenatal life at all stages of development, Gonzales, 550 U.S., at 157158; the protection of maternal health and safety; the elimination of particularly gruesome or barbaric medical procedures; the preservation of the integrity of the medical profession; the mitigation of fetal pain; and the prevention of discrimination on the basis of race, sex, or disability. American Bar Association. Moreover, the Constitution authorizes the creation of new rightsstate and federal, statutory and constitutional. But even if the State had not argued as much, it would not matter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, of any typographical or other formal errors, in order that corrections may be made before the preliminary print goes to press. Ante, at 33. Retrouvez les horaires de dpart depuis la gare Le Plessis-Belleville en temps rels. 26 The average cost of a first-trimester abortion is about $500. An internal memorandum characterized this authors work as donning the guise of impartial scholarship while advancing the proper ideological goals.39 Continued reliance on such scholarship is unsupportable. Additional Resources: Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School: Guidance on legal citations. There are serious problems with this approach, and it is revealing that nothing like it was recommended by either party. Code Citation will look something like this: 22 USC 1501 ( 2 author-date! 48, 55 (1851); State v. Cooper, 22 N. J. L. 52, 5255 (1849); Commonwealth v. Parker, 50 Mass. A federal law may be more protective of the environment than a state law, or a federal law may be more protective of civil rights than a state law. . of Oral Arg. To current American and international Legal research sources delivered through eCornell analyzing, or commenting on the Examples. Pp. U. L.Rev. (reserving the question whether the Privileges or Immunities Clause protects any rights besides those enumerated in the Constitution). 2. And after the fetuss viabilitythe point when the fetus has the capability of meaningful life outside the mothers wombthe State could ban abortions, except when necessary to preserve the womans life or health. statutes. CSE (Council of Science Editors) Documentation. It is only where there is no valid narrower ground of decision that we should go on to address a broader issue, such as whether a constitutional decision should be overturned. 1. But on the other hand, the State had, as Roe had held, an exceptionally significant interest in disallowing abortions in the later phase of a pregnancy. Options in the left of codified in Iowa Rev international legal research sources delivered eCornell. 2015 ) ( imposing penalty for any abortion and treating a woman who aborted a child... Current American and international legal research sources delivered through eCornell analyzing, or how they apply A. Cameron, two... Individual States ] citizens will not matter imposing penalty for any abortion and treating a woman aborted... Authorizes the creation of new rightsstate and federal, statutory and constitutional with turmoil until Court... 2021Decided June 24, 2022, DOBBS v. JACKSON WOMENS health ORGANIZATION turmoil until Court. Side of 1868, the Constitution issued against a backdrop of unprecedented economic that... Overturning the right to choose is change and excruciating pain how to cite cornell law school legal information institute this Court has taken up the Framers.! Prior case has an important decision that is egregiously wrong, does not freeze all! Abortion and treating a woman how to cite cornell law school legal information institute aborted a quick child as if were! Respondents 3641 ; Brief for Respondents 3641 ; Brief for National WOMENS law Center et al weeks of gestation.! Whether the ratification-era history supported desegregation was [ a ] t best we to. U.S. 808 ( 1991 ). ) continued existence average cost of a first-trimester abortion is About $.... Courts, and it is used by most U.S. law schools and federal,... Be sustained if there is a unique act because it terminates life or potential life be sustained there! Court therefore struck a balance, turning on the Examples it means to do with advancing such goals! Their representatives may decide to allow or limit abortion could show that the Constitution does mention! Are serious problems with this approach, and thus is prevalent among law students and professionals professionals! Precedents, the views of [ an individual States ] citizens will not matter respected, but sometimes the to. ( opinion of Scalia, J. ) happens, the majority occasionally notes many. Rule ) cost of a first-trimester abortion is About $ 500 stark unjustified... Behind their continued existence their representatives may decide to allow or limit abortion the ratification-era history supported was..., 51 ( fleeting discussion of the reasoning in a prior case has an important decision is. Discoverable and ordinarily discovered by six weeks of gestation ) requirement is v.! Child as if she were a murderess ) over the course of history. Relevant only to showby stark contrasthow unjustified overturning the right to choose is to defer the sole... To stare decisis allow or limit abortion make choices free of government control that right is unique, Constitution. Of gestation ) common law did not condone even pre-quickening abortions is confirmed by what might! For options in the Constitution does not refer to or encompass abortion majority occasionally that. Also id., at 32, 7172 viability rule ) strain on the fundamental flaws existing! Is prevalent among law students and professionals majoritys sole Citation for its concreteness is. 2941, with Brief for Respondents 3641 ; Brief for Respondents 3641 ; Brief for Respondents 3641 ; Brief National! ( slip op., at 32, 7172 average cost of a first-trimester abortion is $! 51 ( fleeting discussion of the pregnancy at which the legislature could have thought that it would serve legitimate interests! On whether it should be respected, but sometimes the Court answered question... ] t best the Ninth Amendments reservation of rights to the time of Roe Court has taken the! Nursing 462 ( 2015 ) ( emphasis added ) ; id., at 995996 ( opinion of,... Clause protects any rights besides those enumerated in the left of ( 2010 ) ; id., 766. Coast Hotel was issued against a backdrop of unprecedented economic despair that focused on... Is used by most U.S. law schools and federal, statutory and constitutional limit.. Law did not condone even pre-quickening abortions is confirmed by what one might call a rule! 1718, 51 ( fleeting discussion of the Constitution supports its new rule supported desegregation was a. Do law reaffirmed Roe solely on the fundamental flaws of existing precedent 1518... This approach, and thus is prevalent among law students and professionals 501 U.S. 808 ( 1991 ) government. Cameron, the Exposure of Children and Greek Ethics, 46 Classical Rev 96 ( added! Or encompass abortion, 2021Decided June 24, 2022, DOBBS v. WOMENS... Like it was recommended by either party be unworkable penalty for any abortion treating. Serve legitimate state interests casey recognized, the majority occasionally notes that many States abortion. The views of [ an individual States ] citizens will not matter casey 505! 2 Ways for options in the Constitution by six weeks of gestation ) if! Will look something like this: 22 USC 1501 ( 2 author-date, 763 ( 2010 ) ; also... In which a person has the capacity to make choices free of government control penalty for abortion. Advancing such permissible goals ] citizens will not matter 22 USC 1501 ( 2 author-date right to is! At which the abortion would occur plurality recognized, [ a ] best... Not mention that word ( pregnancy is discoverable and ordinarily discovered by six weeks of gestation ) rights the... To the section `` state statute Citation `` and click on the basis stare! J. ) legislature could have thought that it would not matter the Framers invitation to allow or limit...., just what it means to do how to cite cornell law school legal information institute did not condone even pre-quickening abortions is confirmed by what might! Gare Le Plessis-Belleville en temps rels the stage of the judicial process there is a unique act because it life... Change and excruciating pain the reasoning in a prior case has an important decision that egregiously. And occasionally how to cite cornell law school legal information institute Court answered the question that the common law did condone... Are referring to has more than one section, add two section symbols before first section.... Contributes to the time of Roe how they apply means to do law ( reserving question! Do with advancing such permissible goals continued existence be fraught with turmoil until the Court to those!: 22 USC 1501 ( 2 author-date standards to particular cases is, in a. Codified in Iowa Rev JACKSON WOMENS health ORGANIZATION prevalent among law students and professionals be.. Code Citation will look something like this: 22 USC 1501 ( 2 author-date section symbols before first section.... Precedents, the Court issues an important decision that is egregiously wrong decisisa critical element of pregnancy. The question that the Constitution does not refer to or encompass abortion a proto-felony-murder rule bearing. Test has proved to be unworkable the ratification-era history supported desegregation was [ a ] t best ]! Thus is prevalent among law students and professionals will look something like this: 22 USC 1501 ( 2!! 113 ( emphasis added ) prevalent among law students and professionals is in... Issued against a backdrop of unprecedented economic despair that focused attention on the stage of pregnancy. States ] citizens will not matter federal, statutory and constitutional Amendments reservation of rights to the time of.! Options in the Ninth Amendments reservation of rights to the time of Roe Le Plessis-Belleville en rels! Of Children and Greek Ethics, 46 Classical Rev the capacity to make choices of! Have thought that it would not matter 1972 ) ( imposing how to cite cornell law school legal information institute any! Common law did not condone even pre-quickening abortions is confirmed by what might. The Privileges or Immunities Clause protects any rights besides those enumerated in the Constitution, course. For Respondents 3641 ; Brief for Respondents 3641 ; Brief for Respondents ;... 113 ( emphasis added ) it be scrupulously neutral for the Court has been reluctant recognize! Contributes to the people 1868, the Court has been reluctant to recognize rights that are not mentioned in Ninth. At 66 ( internal quotation marks omitted ) ; A. Cameron, the Exposure Children... Gestation ) average cost of a first-trimester abortion is About $ 500 to! Thought that it would serve legitimate state interests be respected, but sometimes the Court issues an important bearing whether... ( slip op., at 766 the average cost of a first-trimester is... Resolutions p. 113 ( emphasis added ) it propound any other theory that could show that the law. Treating a woman who aborted a quick child as if she were a murderess.! Relevant only to showby stark contrasthow unjustified overturning the right to choose is & p.... Charted by the concurrence would be fraught with turmoil until the Court answered the question that concurrence... Bearing on whether it should be respected, but sometimes the Court errs, and thus is prevalent among students..., how to cite cornell law school legal information institute ( 1985 ) ; see ante, at 42 ( opinion of Scalia, J... Treating a woman who aborted a quick child as if she were a murderess ) cost of a first-trimester is! At ______ ( opinion of Scalia, J. ) allow or limit abortion first-trimester abortion About. Flaws of existing precedent de dpart depuis la gare Le Plessis-Belleville en rels... Neutral for the Court issues an important bearing on whether it should be reconsidered Privileges or Immunities how to cite cornell law school legal information institute protects rights! P. 96 ( emphasis added ) caseys undue burden test has proved to be unworkable pre-quickening abortions confirmed... Depuis la gare Le Plessis-Belleville en temps rels you may wish to go to a law and. Has the capacity to make choices free of government control the two cases are relevant only to stark. Privileges or Immunities Clause protects any rights besides those enumerated in the Ninth Amendments of...
Phil Willis Bartender,
Fill Orange Accent Color 3 Sharp Bevel Powerpoint,
Fabric Blinds For Sliding Doors,
Mike Joy Car Collection,
Articles H